Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Sites | Writers | Advertise | My Orble | Login

No Myth Fitness - June 2008

Legs and Back=Conditioning

June 28th 2008 13:50
The simplest observation in the gym last week reminded me of the most fundamental principles in using weight training for fitness. I had worked my chest pretty hard with a continuous series of giant sets whereby my chest was hit over and over with very little time to rest. When I finished, I immediately started a hamstring session by taking a couple of dumbbells off the rack and doing a set of stiff-legged dead lifts. As I finished and started to cross the gym I noticed that my breathing was elevated enough that a little voice(which I ignored) began to tell me that I should wait a little before doing the set of leg curls I was intent upon doing.


Then it ocurred to me: I had worked my chest with relatively heavy sets in rapid fire order and I had stimulated less of a breathing response in all of that than in one set of stiff-legged deadlifts. The principle is clear. Big muscles condition the body.

Yet,walk into the neighborhood gym and pause to watch what's going on in the weight training area. There may well be a fair number of people there and virtually none are working legs. I will futher speculate that of those working few are working on any kind of back movements.I remind you that the two biggest muscle groups in the body are legs and back. Much of what is done in the weight area,however, revolves around the smallest muscles.

Arms,of course,and chest absolutely dominate the training of most people.Men trainers often fall into the big arms and big bench press mentality discussed in NMF before. If I wanted to hold a picnic in my gym and spread out the goodies on a blanket where I would be out of the way of the training population I would choose the squat cage.I would be a little bit more of a nuisance if I picniced amidst the back machines, but not much.


Women are not normally to be found doing squats or anything else that trains legs unless its the leg extension machine. Hamstrings? I can't remember a women in my gym working a stiff legged deadlift. They will use the leg curl if its near the other machines. Women working back? A rarity.

This is crucial for a new trainer to understand: If you are going to condition the heart and lungs, you can do it with weight and the best way to do that is to focus your workouts on the largest muscle groups.That means that legs and back are integral to your workouts and never shortchanged compared to the more popular body parts. Your servant, as always.
31
Vote
Shared on
   


Women: No Bulk-No Fat-Lotta Shape

June 25th 2008 12:46
Today I set out my assumptions before I enter into the text of my argument. I assume that a maturing female does not want to carry around bodyfat that she doesn't need to carry around. I assume that she would like to be of an ideal scale weight and yet maintain a feminine shape. I assume that she does not want to appear bulky in her clothing whether she is carrying any extra bodyfat or not. I assume that a diet-exercise program which leaves a woman lighter on the scale but lacking her feminine shape would not exactly please her even though she might be overjoyed with a desired weight loss.

Is there a way for women to remove bodyfat and still keep a pleasing shape. Is there a Goldilocks fitness program that removes and keeps off fat and does not strip away shape or add muscle that can easily be taken for fat when it is beneath clothing? If you have read my last couple of posts you know that I don't think intense dieting or dieting intense cardio like running or hour long elliptical sessions are the method. They destroy muscle and less muscle means less shape and less caloric demand.

Obviously, a Goldilocks fitness program must remove fat and retain shape by keeping the body just right-not bulky and not stringy. That is not an easy task but it can be done by someone willing to dedicate some time to it(and, more than time, energy).

Goldilocks consists of a diet whose effect is a caloric deficit of a few hundred calories a day. If you think you burn about 2000 calories a day, I would think 400 or 20% would be a reasonable target. This is a slow loss diet because slow retards the body's response to caloric deficiency: tearing down muscle. It is also just enough to be difficult to maintain. The body's response will be to ramp up hunger. You will be able to do it though. And at that rate you have a good chance to lose a goodly amount of fat.

In addition to this slow diet I suggest that a women pursue weight training with everything she has. That means no more silly woman-training, like doing a thousand reps with a two pound weight-to avoid bulk. No, you are going to work like men do-as heavy as you can and as often as you can. You are trying to burn calories and keep your muscle and thereby your shape. If you do not work all out you will be sending a puny signal to your body that you are not really intent on change. If you go all out your body will know that it cannot get rid of your muscles in response to the diet. Your actions will constantly tell it that it not only needs the muscles it has but also could really use some more.

The result will be a body that is fit without bulk and without muscle loss. Your legs and arms will firm up, your chest will be strong for the task it has(You know what I mean.)Your shoulders will be straight and slighty wider at the same time as your abdomen shrinks. Your hour glass figure will be enhanced.You will also have definition in your body that highlights your fitness.

Now, I know that the religious tenent of femininity says that weights will make you bulky. It is nonsense,but hard to jettison. So,I suggest that you keep an open mind. Start the above diet, go to the gym and train with weights as hard as your fitness level permits, and see what transpires. If you discover that you gain muscular bulk at an Arnold pace, do two things-stop lifting (it will disappear) and write NMF immediately. We will sell your training secrets to men,many of whom really want to bulk up and can't becaus theire muscles just won't grow big like yours.

I suggest that what will really happen is that you will find this Goldilocks system really productive and exciting. You will see good results and you will feel like someone who has the know-how to shape her body. Or you can treadmill until the cows come home and be happy that, although you are still fat, you are not bulky. Your servant, as always.
47
Vote
Shared on
   


Lose Weight? Lose Muscle!

June 23rd 2008 12:59
We continue to counteract the irrational with the factual today and that is never an easy way to go. The fear that women have of bulk is irrational and even a tiny bit of commonsense will prove that,but it does not mean that the fear will disappear. We make the attempt nevertheless. In this post I intend to challenge the methods used by many dieting women and in the next give my pitch for what will really work long term.

If you are a lady and you are not happy with your shape and/or weight there are a number of routes you can travel to try to change the situation. You can diet down to a few hundred calories a day and you will lose weight for awhile and a goodly portion of this weight will be muscle. That is the way that the body does its business. It shepherds fat and throws aside muscle and, while the starving person continues to weigh less, there is no likelihood that she will be shapely. What we can assume is that once a scale weight goal is reached there will be a period when reality sets in and the starver will have to realize that her reduced muscle mass means futher weight loss will be nearly impossible or that normal calorie consumption will bring about rapid weight gain. Muscles burn calories.

A really sincere dieter may want to spur weight loss by adding some intense cardio work to eat up extra calories. Lets use running as an example. The person who runs in combination with dieting will surely lose weight faster than the sedentary dieter, but this runner will also lose muscle tissue faster than the sitter.The principle is the same:the body rids itself of heavy muscle before it rids itself of fat. Running is so tough on the body that it hurries to get rid of the heaviest component it can do without.That is muscle and muscle burns calories. Stop running and the muscle reduced body will burn fewer caloies than before the running spree. It will be that much easier to gain weight.

Treadmill walking and the elliptical are essentially proxies for running. They are only effective to the extent that they mimic the effect of running on the body. They offer a user friendlier approach to the same objective: lose weight by burning it off. They also have the same effect; they cause the body to jettison its muscle to lighten the load. Because they are less intense than running, these proxies are less effective at tearing down muscle and also at burning up calories.

Finally, a dieter may want to add some kind of free exercise instead of running etc. This is a basically sound idea. Yet a few minutes a day will not really burn that many calories and the kind of long free exercise sessions that will burn a lot of calories will also mimic running and tear down muscle etc. Yes, there will be some moderate firming for awhile, but the more effective the weight loss the less the firming will take hold.

So none of the above strategies is really going to work in the long term. You know someone who dieted or dieted-ran or dieted-treadmilled off a lot of weight and then gained it back. They are living proof that muscle gone is not the way to keep off weight. There is a better way. Your servant, as always.
46
Vote
Shared on
   


Women: Muscle, Fat, Shape, Reality

June 22nd 2008 13:56
Once again we address the issue that according to the latest fitness gadget infomercial strikes fear into the heart of any women who merely contemplates exercise: bulk.

Last time we actually said the “never to be spoken” of women’s fitness: women are getting bulky no matter what they do with exercise. That is the fat truth. The real issue, I think, when women talk about weight training is the fear that they will become covered with skeletal muscle which beneath clothing will look pretty much like fat looks beneath clothing. No women are so stupid as to be actually afraid that they will develop huge arms etc and look like Mr. Olympia


[ Click here to read more ]
47
Vote
Shared on
   


Incredible Bulk:Women in Fear

June 21st 2008 12:34
Myth making never rests and the work of the anti-myth crusader is thus never done. Careful readers will soon recognize the territory into which we enter today as that through which we have trudged before.

A recent glimpse at an infomercial assured me that the lies women are told about fitness go on and on. A contrivance of some type appeared on my TV that made the claim that it could offer a ten minute fix to the fitness of women everywhere. The absurdity of that alone should have been enough to set off warning lights in the NMF command center,but this commercial went further. Amidst the scenes of blissful ladies doing what appeared to be simple(but thoroughly effective?!) exercises with blissful smiles on their faces there appeared a new angle-at least to me.Our infobabe guide suddenly appeared amidst a bevy of profoundly fatless,yet shapely professional models. They all assured the viewer in succession that they used the ten minute miracle and that with it they had no worries about falling beneath the spectre that was claimed to stalk any woman who apparently even passes over the threshold of the weight area of a gym-bulking up


[ Click here to read more ]
47
Vote
Shared on
   


More Posts
5 Posts
2 Posts
9 Posts
201 Posts dating from November 2006
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
Moderated by JohnR
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]