Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Sites | Writers | Advertise | My Orble | Login

No Myth Fitness - August 2007

Toward Giant Sets

August 29th 2007 10:01
The toughest way to train with weights is the ill-termed "giant set",in which all the sets for a specific body part are done in a series or circuit. When you use a giant set you are asking the muscle in focus to perform over and over without significant amounts of rest. This is not the kind of workout I would recommend for someone who is relatively new to weights. In fact, if you get all excited and try to do a couple of giant sets, you will either be amazingly unsuccessful or you will damage the muscle tissue so much that you will explore new vistas in post workout soreness. That kind of soreness is not really a good idea. It is better to tailor your long term workout strategy with giant sets as your ultimate goal.


If you are a beginner, you must acclimate your body over months,if not years, to the stress of training and progressively change your workouts to demand that adaptation take place. As I said in the last post, your body will try to hang on to homeostasis with a virulence. Much of real training is the battle against this proclivity. Jumping into giant sets without a slow transition isn't the answer either.

To really get serious about training after your initial period of getting accustomed to weight training you must divide your body into parts and train two, or maybe three, parts in one workout. The central issue in this division is to ramp up stress on each body part during a given workout,but to limit these workouts to no more than two a week. During these workouts you must also increase difficulty by systematically reducing the amount of time you rest between sets. This can be accomplished by setting up workouts where two bodyparts are trained at the same time with no rest between sets.

To train two parts at one you will want to select muscles that are not antagonistic one to the other. The back and calves are an example. The back is a big group and working it hard is simply going to require some rest time between sets. The calves,however, can be trained right after the back and will allow the latter to rest at the same time. If you follow the back-calves pattern you will be able to move from set to set with almost no rest. In a few moments you will have done the sets that make up the workout for each. At the end of your back-calves work you can do a combination of biceps and abs,moving back and forth as fast as you can.


I used the above technique for many years. During such workouts I tried to average one set per minute. With moving and weight changes this is a fast pace. Recently, I have gone to giant sets for most of my body. It was,I warn you, prepared by literally years of these fast sets to undertake a step up. You can do yourself a real favor by dividing your body into non-antagonistic combinations and trying to move through a workout of the two together as fast as you can. If you do not up the ante you will never come close to really tough training.

You will discover something as you try the one set per minute gambit. This is a pretty aerobic experience. Thus your general fitness will be enhanced as well as you muscle size and tone. Your servant,as always.

53
Vote
   


What would be the most demanding way in which to train with weights and how would one work up to training in that manner? That is today's object. First, let me say that in planning weight training programs there are two levels. One is a broader strategic level which includes more macro issues like how many days to train, what exercises to use, how to divide the body into parts for individual training. Associated with this strategic level is a tactical one where the issues are how to maximize the individual sets of exercises to make sure that every set contributes to greater fitness. Various intensity techniques often discussed at NMF are important at this level.

Learning how to evolve the most demanding training scheme is a strategic issue.It resides in how you set up your workouts. Tactical issues like rep schemes and intensity techniques like forced reps, for example, can be utilized at whatever level of overall training you might find yourself.

The most demanding training regime is to do all the movements for a given body part within a narrow time frame. All chest movements or biceps etc would thus be done at one time and no other body parts would be directly incorporated. Lets use back training as an example. To train back at the maximum level you would take four or five movements that you prefer and do them on after another,stopping between sets only to move and possibly add or subtract weight(Of course, everything should be as much as possible prepared in advance.). In this way your back training would consist of an unbroken series of back movements. At the predetermined conclusion of the series you would move on to another body part and subject it to a similar circuit.

Let me say it another way. If you began weight training via a circuit of machines you would be returning to this method, except every station in your series would train the same muscle. It isn't an insight of genius to perceive that this is very tough work.Notice,however, that the tactical aspect of training is not addressed. How much weight you use, rep schemes, and intensity techniques would have to be improvised in accordance with your fitness level and capacity to endure discomfort. For your general information this circuit for one body part was long ago termed a "giant set." I find the name inadequate because it is really several sets we are describing and I tend to object to hyperbole.

The more extreme the tactical side of your training the more this strategy will yield. If you are afraid of sets that proceed too quickly upon one another or insist on using weights lighter than you are capable of, this strategy will yield much less. Combine this strategy with demanding tactics and you will soon see what real training is all about.Next time,I will outline how one progresses from beginner to doer of "giant sets." Your servant, as always.
36
Vote
   


More Overloading

August 23rd 2007 10:47
More on overloading today. The fact is that the human body seems almost fanatically attached to homeostasis. That means that it will maintain the present state of affairs unless rudely forced to adapt to something new. This intransigence means that breaking the body's attachment to its present state is only realized by a programmatic and long term approach to change. One day of harder than average training will avail nothing in terms of improvement;it is only when systematic overload is applied to the body on a regular basis that any real progress in fitness can be expected.

This overloading is not rocket science. Lets say that you are doing bicep work of five sets a workout twice a week. If you simply add two sets to each workout you will hardly notice it. Your body,however, will notice it. It is not tied to your conscience mind in such a way that it only reacts to that which makes an impression on you as your train. It will actually be experiencing a 40% increase in its workload and the repeated nature of this increase will "convince" your body that this must be a consistent part of its future. We all talk about "getting used to" something. In the gym this is absolutely a crucial element in success.

Where I think weight training gets difficult is at the point when the body is fully adapted to some new overload. It goes right back to homeostasis. After a 3 week period of 40% more biceps your system will accept the long term status of this new stress and make adaptations. Within a few weeks more you will notice that the new sets are really pretty easy to perform and get the sense that you could do more. Well, that's your cue to do more. It doesn't have to be more sets. It can be heavier weights or quicker sets,but,if it is not systematic,it will be a waste.

At some point you will become so attuned to the process that you will be able to "play by ear" i.e. make important changes to your workouts based on the feel of your body and its responses to the training your are doing. That will take a while. Your servant, as always.
25
Vote
   


The Absolute Beginner Workout

August 21st 2007 11:31
Today I offer those exercises by body parts which I feel are the absolute best for that body part. If you have never trained with weights, you can get maximum benefit for your body by doing each of these movements. In fact, you could markedly improve your fitness by picking two or three per workout and doing them one time to your limit. For the absolute newby once a week for each will make significant changes in the body.

1. Squats. Use a machine, if you must. I suggest full, rock bottom squats to the lowest position possible. Set a weight that it will be a struggle to do eight times. If you use a bar, never do a repetition if you feel you may not be able to do it safely. This movement is the queen and failure to include it robs your heart and lungs of a chance to expand their short term capacities. It is really tough


[ Click here to read more ]
23
Vote
   


Use Your Brian

August 18th 2007 12:19
Unless you are one of the truly gifted whose bodies add muscle easily, whose waists are naturally wasp-like, do not gain weight, and readily adapt to physical regimens your brain is the most important asset you have in the battle for fitness. You will be as fit in the body as you are in the brain. To get your body into the shape you want you will have to learn and apply principles that are not always intuitive. In fact much of really getting into shape involves the counterintuitive. What seems right often is not. Today a few basic axioms that you must keep in mind if you want to obtain fitness.

1. More work is better than less.
This seems obvious,but there is alot of talk about overtraining these days. Yes,you can overtrain, at least in the short term. If you are new to training of any kind I seriously doubt that your body will allow itself to be overtrained. Overtraining is a phenomenon of the obsessive. If you have a normal life, you are unlikely to be working enough to put your body into duress. I recommend that you worry about getting more workouts than less


[ Click here to read more ]
27
Vote
   


Make Your Workouts More Aerobic

August 10th 2007 16:29
The newcomer to weight training often brings with him/her some preconceptions, rising out of the needed simplicity of introductory workouts, which are best relinquished when familiarity with the whole concept of weight training is achieved.Certainly one of these is the idea that weight training is somehow fundamentally at variance with aerobic training. I have written in the past about the error of believing that weights cannot improve aerobic capacity. For today a few principles that can make your workouts as aerobic as you wish.

The reason that running, cycling, and treadmilling are aerobic is simply that they employ the legs in rapid movement over a period of time. The legs make large demands on the cardio and pulmonary systems simply because they are so large. This fact means that weight training centered on legs is likely to be aerobic. If you are a beginner in weight training, it is very important to incorporate leg training from the very beginning and to consider it as integral a part of workouts as any other part


[ Click here to read more ]
23
Vote
   


Overloading:An Example

August 9th 2007 17:50
My last entry broached the subject of overloading and its centrality in developing fitness. This is true in whatever activity you choose for your fitness.The essence of overloading is to make sure that you are not just going through the motions.

During my latest workout I was reminded once again how important applying overloading is to improve fitness. I was standing in front of the standing deltoid machine where I had just run off six repetitions with a fairly heavy weight. At the instant I reached six reps a reality hit me: that was easy,extremely easy. I could have stopped at that point and told myself that I had done one of my prescribed sets.Would I have made any progress toward greater fitness? Compared to not training and spending the time on the couch, I would answer yes. If I ever want to reach a level of fitness, that is satisfying to me the answer is no


[ Click here to read more ]
36
Vote
   


Overtrained? I Doubt It

August 6th 2007 13:04
Most of the people who enter a gym in a given day will never really train too much for their body's capacity to adapt. Most trainers are locked into the ridiculous three days a week program, which means that they are there on Mondays and Wednesdays. No one on a three day program actually trains on Friday. If you do not believe this, drop by the gym on Friday evening at the time it is normally packed on Mondays. This entry is for the relative few who are serious enough about weight training and fitness to let enthusiasm burden the body.

If you are training every other day you are going to have to do some serious work to over train, unless you train your whole body every other day. If that happens to be what you are doing, you are expending alot of wasted energy. Set up a regimen in which only two,maybe three, body parts are trained in any one workout and your every other day workout will begin to bear more fruit. I've written on how to split up your body many times. Take a look at the achives


[ Click here to read more ]
20
Vote
   


Intensity=Overload

August 4th 2007 15:49
I have written in the past that in the case of the average newcomer or intermediate weight trainer the greatest shortcoming is that he/she does not practice intensity on a consistent basis. Today a few comments on the nature of intensity and maybe a useful way to understand it.

If you would like your muscles to reward you with fitness and/or strength, you must force them to endure ever different levels of stress. A good term for this is "overload." If your muscles are asked to move weights that are a normal load for them, they will not be subjected to stress. If your muscles are asked to move weights at time intervals that are the same day after to day they will not be subjected to stress. If your muscles are asked to move weights a specific and unchanging number of times per session they will not be subjected to stress


[ Click here to read more ]
27
Vote
   


Breathing in Weight Training

August 3rd 2007 15:24
In my most recent entry I made the case for weight training as an aerobic activity and encouraged everyone to pursue it as such. The obvious question to be considered by anyone convinced to do so is how this is to be accomplished. As I said in my last entry the chief way is to regulate the intervals between weight sets carefully. The shorter these intervals the more aerobic the workout.

The way you approach the act of breathing during each set is similarly important in adding an aerobic demension to your weight work. It is quite easy to hold your breath, for instance, while you do your repetitions and without special attention you may well be doing a fair amount of just that in your workout. Holding breath is the very worst way to train.Proper breathing,in contrast,not only adds to your aerobic capacity but can increase the strength which you can apply to your movements


[ Click here to read more ]
24
Vote
   


Weight Training Not Aerobic?

August 1st 2007 13:22
A particularly pronounced example of a fitness myth is that weight training is not aerobic. Actually it is probably more of an oversimplification than a full-fledged myth. Yet by assuming the truth of the proposition many people steer themselves away from the very weight training that can provide so many benefits that aerobic exercise cannot.

It is obvious that lifting a heavy weight is a different type of exercise than running a mile. The latter is said to be aerobic because to perform it the body will incorporate oxygen, while lifting a weight is so intense and rapid that it will occur anaerobically or without oxygen, because the body takes a certain amount of time to martial its pulmonary capacity. When so-called experts (or at least the purveyors of fitness information to the public) elaborate on this basic axiom,however, the misinformation begins to flow


[ Click here to read more ]
23
Vote
   


More Posts
5 Posts
2 Posts
9 Posts
201 Posts dating from November 2006
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
Moderated by JohnR
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]